Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Different Style of Peer Reviewing

I really liked how we did peer reviews during class on Tuesday. Reading out loud my own paper made it easier for me to realize how my paper really sounded like and I was able to get very useful feedback. I've read over my papers many times, but reading out loud really is more effective, I think anyways. For my literacy narrative I was able to see how my paper was lacking somewhat the "worldly" aspect and with the help from Jessica W. I have a better idea as to what I could add to my paper.

For the proposal paper, I felt it REALLY helpful with the points that we were to find within our body paragraphs. This helped me identify what specifically I was missing from my paper. I also think this checklist helped clear up my confusion with how to go about improving my paper, as this is one of my papers that needs some work yet. Thanks for the helpful checklist for our proposal papers!

As for our research paper goes...  I know for fact that my research paper needs lots of work still. But I was really excited about getting someone else's paper to read and give feedback on, rather than trying to read through mine again for the millionth time. I believe this will be more helpful in the long run, when it comes to editing and improving my research paper. I'm aware of what my paper is at the moment, and I'm looking forward for some great feedback from Erika! (:  Thanks!

No comments:

Post a Comment